+30 2610 876 876 info@geobit-instruments.com

Noise level measurement for geothermal monitoring seismic network

Case studies

Geobit, July 2016

1. Introduction

This project aims at a) the characterization of the ground noise at the geothermal site and b) the investigation if a sufficient signal to noise ratio can be achieved by installing seismic instrument at intended depth of the seismic monitoring wells of 100-120m. The installation well is located only 215m in line of sight from a main road which is the main noise source of the area. Traffic is higher at daytime and lower at nighttime or weekends.

2. Equipment

The equipment used for this test was

  • C100 seismic sensor
  • SRI32L seismic digitizer-recorder with integrated sensor electronics
  • 12V battery
  • GPS antenna, power cable

The sensor was placed into the water well at depths of 30, 60, 86 meters.

Picture 1

S100 sensor with 125 m cable

3. Equipment modifications

C100 sensor’s cable had to be extended to 125m from the standard length of 20m. A very special lightweight cable, with excellent shielding, pressure resistance with breaking tense 350kg was selected to support the sensor.

A sensor adapter was necessary to be constructed by GEObit to ensure excellent coupling between the sensor and the casing of the test well.

Picture 2

The SRi32L recorder in operation

Pictures 3, 4, 5: S100 sensor adapter

4. Installation

The sensor installation was done with the usage of a pushing stick. We used strong (16atm) plastic 3/4inch pipe pieces of 2.5m length, able to be connected with metallic clutches link. Additionally, special care was taken for driving the sensor’s cable and the packer’s wire while we rigged the sensor down.

Once the sensor with its adapter was placed at the desired depth, the PVC stick was pulled up for five meters ensuring no more contact with the adapter.

The digitizer and the battery were placed at the nearby old small shelter.  The GPS antenna was placed outside of the small shelter.

Pictures 6, 7, 8

S100 sensor insertion into the borehole

5. Recording scheme & parameters

The sampling rate of the recorder was set to 200sps. Since the main known noise source is the nearby road, we oriented the sensor in relation with it. The sensor North-South (Y) axis was oriented vertically to the direction of the road axis while the East-West (X) axis was oriented in parallel with the road axis.

6. Testing the installation

We used the DataMonitor program to monitor the recorder’s data in real time.

We made also some weight drop tests with a standard weight (6kg) at fixed positions (30m, 60m, 150m), dropped from a fixed height (2m) from the ground to check the amplitude of the recording signal versus depth.

Pictures 9, 10

S100 sensor & recorder inspection at site

7. Data retrieval & Data Analysis

The data of the SRi32L recorder unit are stored into the removable microSD flash card. A quick view of the noise can be done using the “Helicorder” software, which plots 24h data on the screen.

7.1. Noise plot at 30m

Picture 11

Signal plot at 30m, daytime

Picture 12

Signal plot at 30m, nighttime

7.2. Noise plot at 60m

Picture 13

Signal plot at 60m, daytime

Picture 14

Signal plot at 60m, nighttime

7.3. Noise plot at 86m

Picture 15

Signal plot at 86m, daytime

Picture 16

Signal plot at 86m, nighttime

7.4. Noise plot comparisons

Pictures 17, 18, 19

Signal plot at daytime, 30m, 60m, 86m

Pictures 20, 21, 22

Signal plot at nighttime, 30m, 60m, 86m

GEObit engineers processed the records in depth and they provided to the customer detailed noise analysis of the area.

8. Simulation of the weight-drop test as a micro-earthquake

8.1. Empirical method

Using the DataViewer tool and the ability to calculate the magnitude and the distance of a recorded earthquake (based on an empirical formula), we simulated the weight drop signal with a real seismic signal. The simulation shows that it represents an earthquake magnitude -1.12R occurred at distance 1km from the sensor.

Picture 23

Weight drop at 60m from the well’s head when sensor depth is 86m – seismic event simulation

8.2. Magnitude calculation based on Hypoinverse formula

This analysis was based on the Earthquake Magnitude calculation formula (eq.1) used by Hypoinverse software. The signal amplitude (Wood Anderson trace) is denoted as Awa, while F1 and F2 are derived using specific formulas in Hypoinverse.

ML = log(Awa/2)+F1(s)+F2(d)

For using this formula, first we had to convert the data to Wood-Anderson seismogram.

Picture 24

Minimum amplitude pick from the Wood-Anderson seismogram

Picture 25

Maximum amplitude pick from the Wood-Anderson seismogram

We analyzed a weight drop signal that occurred 60m from the surface of the well, the relative position of the weight drop and the recorder gives the following formula. Awa was measured as 0.13mm. as Awa, while F1 and F2 are derived using specific formulas in Hypoinverse.

ML = log(0.13/2)-0.047+0.088 = 1.18

The result is similar to the empirical one. So it is proven that the station is able to record events with magnitude less than -1R even with the presence of noise created from the local road when the sensor is placed at 86m.

 9. References

  • DataViewer software tool – GEObit
  • Helicorder software tool – GEObit
  • PQL II program for viewing seismic data – Passcal
  • Seisgram2k – Anthony Lomax
  • Hypoinverse manual – USGS
Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Join our mailing list to receive the latest news and updates from our team.

You have Successfully Subscribed!